Mazda 6 2015 vs Mazda 6 2012

 
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 175 HP150 HP
Torque: 420 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 seconds9.1 seconds
Mazda 6 2015 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 2015 engine produces 25 HP more power than Mazda 6 2012, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mazda 6 2012. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 2015 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.53.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Mazda 6 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 2015 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2015 could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 2015 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2012.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1370 km in combined cycle1580 km in combined cycle
1580 km on highway1820 km on highway
980 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km380'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years5 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda CX-5Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mazda 6 2015 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.87 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2015 and Mazda 6 2012 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 481 litres489 litres
Mazda 6 2015 has 8 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6 2012.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2015 is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2012, which means Mazda 6 2015 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`055no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 17 8006600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv