Mazda 6 2010 vs Honda Accord 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2013
Honda Accord
2011 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 3.72.0 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 120 - 272 HP150 - 201 HP
Torque: 165 - 400 NM192 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 11.4 seconds8 - 10.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 10.35.3 - 8.6
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.73 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 5 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 519 litres467 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 52 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Honda Accord.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`974~ 2`024
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 44006800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv