Mazda 6 2012 vs Honda Accord 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 192 HP | 150 - 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 420 NM | 192 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.6 seconds | 8 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 6.3 | 5.3 - 8.6 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 15 cm longer than the Honda Accord, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 467 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 22 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.9 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`024 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
| |