Mazda 6 2002 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Volkswagen Passat
2000 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.31.6 - 4.0

Performance

Power: 120 - 166 HP100 - 275 HP
Torque: 165 - 310 NM148 - 370 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 12.3 seconds6.8 - 15 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.4 - 10.55.5 - 13.0
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.68 m
Width: 1.78 m1.75 m
Height: 1.45 m1.50 m
Mazda 6 is larger, but lower.
Mazda 6 is 1 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 505 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1712 litresno data
Mazda 6 has 10 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`959~ 2`080
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10001400
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volkswagen Passat has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv