Mazda 6 2008 vs Volkswagen Passat 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Volkswagen Passat
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 6 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Passat can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.4 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 120 - 185 HP102 - 250 HP
Torque: 165 - 400 NM148 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 - 11.7 seconds7.1 - 13.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.6 - 8.25.8 - 10.1
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.77 m
Width: 1.80 m1.82 m
Height: 1.44 m1.52 m
Mazda 6 is smaller.
Mazda 6 is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 505 litres603 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1751 litresno data
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space.
Mazda 6 has 98 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`051~ 1`768
Safety:
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 30002200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Passat has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv