Mazda 6 2010 vs Ford Focus 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Ford Focus
2011 - 2014
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.6 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 120 - 180 HP95 - 250 HP
Torque: 165 - 400 NM150 - 360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 - 11.8 seconds6.5 - 12.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 8.14.5 - 7.2
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.56 m
Width: 1.80 m1.82 m
Height: 1.49 m1.51 m
Mazda 6 is 23 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 519 litres490 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1751 litres1516 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 235 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Focus.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`061~ 1`954
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 42004600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford Focus has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv