Mazda 6 2005 vs Mazda 3 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.31.3 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 120 - 166 HP84 - 260 HP
Torque: 165 - 360 NM122 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 11 seconds6.1 - 14.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 8.94.7 - 9.7
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 130 mm (5.1 inches)160 mm (6.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.49 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.47 m
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 6 is 20 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 492 litres413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1662 litres1285 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 79 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 377 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`946~ 1`796
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 18002400
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv