Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Kia Sportage 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 18.4 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 82 HP more power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 83 NM more than Kia Sportage. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 11.8 | |
| Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Kia Sportage gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 11 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 373 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1570 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |