Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Jeep Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 38 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is smaller. Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |