Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 216 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 19.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 10 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 6 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 18 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1080 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |