Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 17 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 15 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Despite less power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Accord, Rover 25, Rover 45 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is smaller, but slightly higher. Land Rover Freelander is 12 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 850 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Hyundai Santa FE has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Hyundai Santa FE, so Hyundai Santa FE quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |