Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Kia Sportage 1999

 
Land Rover Freelander
2000 - 2002
Kia Sportage
1999 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 117 HP95 HP
Torque: 160 NM157 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds18.4 seconds
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive.
Land Rover Freelander engine produces 22 HP more power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Kia Sportage. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.411.8
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle550 km in combined cycle
690 km on highway690 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.32 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.76 m1.65 m
Land Rover Freelander is larger.
Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 4 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data373 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1570 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`930
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 18002200
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Freelander has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Kia Sportage has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv