Land Rover Freelander 2002 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander and Hyundai Santa FE have the same engine power, but Land Rover Freelander torque is 5 NM more than Hyundai Santa FE. Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is smaller, but slightly higher. Land Rover Freelander is 12 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 850 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Land Rover Freelander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander, so Land Rover Freelander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |