Land Rover Freelander 2002 vs Ford Maverick 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 12 HP less power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 85 NM more than Ford Maverick. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.8 | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 985 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |