Land Rover Freelander 2002 vs Ford Maverick 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 7 HP less power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Ford Maverick. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.8 | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 985 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Maverick has
| |