Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 15 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 10.1 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Rover 75, Kia Carnival, Rover 400 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 12 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Land Rover Freelander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander, so Land Rover Freelander quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |