Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Land Rover Freelander 2010

 
Land Rover Freelander
2003 - 2007
Land Rover Freelander
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 112 HP150 HP
Torque: 260 NMn/a NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.3 seconds11.2 seconds
Land Rover Freelander 2010 is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Freelander 2003 engine produces 38 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander 2010. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.67.2
Real fuel consumption: 9.0 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Land Rover Freelander 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Land Rover Freelander 2003 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander 2003 could require 210 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander 2003 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 2010.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway1190 km on highway
650 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption
Land Rover Freelander 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.50 m
Width: 1.81 m1.91 m
Height: 1.71 m1.74 m
Land Rover Freelander 2003 is smaller.
Land Rover Freelander 2003 is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander 2010, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander 2003 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data755 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`505
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 32006600
Rating in user reviews: 7.6/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Freelander has
  • lower price
Land Rover Freelander has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv