Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Mazda Tribute 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 33 HP less power than Mazda Tribute, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mazda Tribute. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 1 cm longer than the Mazda Tribute, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2245 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda Tribute, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |