Land Rover Freelander 2010 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012

 
Land Rover Freelander
2010 - 2012
Land Rover Freelander
2012 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: n/a NM420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds11.7 seconds
Land Rover Freelander 2010 and Land Rover Freelander 2012 have the same engine power.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.96.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Land Rover Freelander 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Land Rover Freelander 2010 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander 2010 could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
1170 km on highway1250 km on highway
810 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Land Rover Freelander 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.50 m
Width: 1.91 m1.91 m
Height: 1.79 m1.74 m
Land Rover Freelander 2010 and Land Rover Freelander 2012 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 755 litres405 litres
Land Rover Freelander 2010 has more luggage capacity.
Land Rover Freelander 2010 has 350 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander 2012.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander 2010 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander 2012.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5052`505
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 660010 800
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Freelander has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Land Rover Freelander has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv