Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 - 177 HP | 112 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 260 NM | 160 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 15.3 seconds | 11.1 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 12.4 | 7.6 - 12.4 | |
|
On average, the Land Rover Freelander 2003 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Land Rover Freelander 2003. On average, a Land Rover Freelander 2003 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Land Rover Freelander 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander 2003 is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander 2003, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Freelander 2003 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |