Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Land Rover Freelander is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Suzuki Grand Vitara has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 97 - 120 HP | 87 - 158 HP | |
Torque: | 165 - 210 NM | 144 - 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 14.6 seconds | 10.9 - 19.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.2 | 6.6 - 11.0 | |
On average, the Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Suzuki Grand Vitara. On average, Land Rover Freelander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 19 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 258 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1080 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 1`863 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |