Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 208 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 24 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.8 | 14.3 | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 22 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1136 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2254 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |