Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 307 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 engine produces 11 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.0 | 13.2 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 is smaller, but higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 is 14 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 has 126 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006. The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`425 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, so Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |