Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 engine produces 55 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 is smaller, but higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 is 14 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 has 126 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, so Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |