Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 11 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Despite less power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller, but higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 13 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 2091 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 589 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The Nissan Pathfinder may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 44 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 2`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |