Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 23 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1691 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 563 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 356 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |