Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Mercedes ML 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 4.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 109 HP less power than Mercedes ML, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 13.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 14.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 630 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 490 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase, Mercedes CLK | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 2`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |