Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 27 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 11.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 8 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 10 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |