Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 347 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 20 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 12.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 285 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler 300C, Jeep Wrangler | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLS, Mercedes SLK | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`812 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |