Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Toyota Highlander 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 337 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota Highlander, but torque is 233 NM more than Toyota Highlander. Despite less power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 10.6 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus RX, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Highlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 391 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 391 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 782 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 2370 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 816 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 5.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 5.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Highlander, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |