Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs BMW X5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 2 HP more power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 30 NM more than BMW X5. Despite the higher power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 1040 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1750 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 162 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1.2 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
BMW X5 has
| |