Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 engine produces 57 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.5 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 206 mm (8.1 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 and Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 000 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |