Jeep Grand Cherokee 1992 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 - 1999
Mitsubishi Pajero
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Jeep Grand Cherokee is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Pajero can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.5 - 5.92.8 - 3.5

Performance

Power: 116 - 237 HP125 - 208 HP
Torque: 278 - 472 NM292 - 313 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 - 13 seconds11.3 - 19.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.9 - 17.912.4 - 14.3
Jeep Grand Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Jeep Grand Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.71 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.65 m1.90 m
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller.
Jeep Grand Cherokee is 21 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 25 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 1136 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2255 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`410~ 3`300
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 52002400
Pros and Cons: Jeep Grand Cherokee has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv