Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Pathfinder can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.7 | 2.5 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 258 HP | 174 - 269 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 - 425 NM | 385 - 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 14 seconds | 8.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 - 16.5 | 9.0 - 13.5 | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Pathfinder. On average, Jeep Grand Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 13 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 2091 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 589 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The Nissan Pathfinder may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 44 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`447 | ~ 2`822 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |