Jeep Cherokee 1993 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 211 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 25 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 39 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Wrangler | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.86 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 42 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |