Jeep Cherokee 1995 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 17 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 11.4 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.86 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 46 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |