Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000

 
Jeep Cherokee
1997 - 2001
Land Rover Freelander
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 4.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 192 HP117 HP
Torque: 305 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds12.6 seconds
Jeep Cherokee engine produces 75 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 145 NM more than Land Rover Freelander.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.610.4
Real fuel consumption: 17.3 l/100km10.5 l/100km
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 6.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
710 km on highway690 km on highway
430 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.38 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.62 m1.76 m
Jeep Cherokee is smaller.
Jeep Cherokee is 13 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 14 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 932 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1954 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data11.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`2232`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 36002000
Pros and Cons: Jeep Cherokee has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Land Rover Freelander has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv