Jeep Cherokee 2001 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 NM | 249 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 26 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 10.8 | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Grand Vitara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.70 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | 691 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1951 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 129 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The Suzuki Grand Vitara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 1 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |