Jeep Cherokee 2005 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003

 
Jeep Cherokee
2005 -
Land Rover Freelander
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.8 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 158 HP112 HP
Torque: 400 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds15.3 seconds
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive.
Jeep Cherokee engine produces 46 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.98.6
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 195 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 78 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway830 km on highway
Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 7 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler VoyagerUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.45 m
Width: 1.82 m1.81 m
Height: 1.82 m1.71 m
Jeep Cherokee is larger.
Jeep Cherokee is 5 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.7 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`6882`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 48003200
Pros and Cons: Jeep Cherokee has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
Land Rover Freelander has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv