Jeep Cherokee 2005 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 29 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.7 | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger. Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1951 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`688 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |