Jeep Cherokee 2005 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 187 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.1 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.62 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`688 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |