Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Opel Antara 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 271 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 217 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 104 HP more power than Opel Antara, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Opel Antara. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 8.8 | |
|
The Opel Antara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but lower. Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm longer than the Opel Antara, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1391 litres | |
| Jeep Cherokee has 10 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.7 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`435 | 2`183 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Opel Antara has
| |