Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 7 HP more power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 50 NM less than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 83 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`475 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |