Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 271 HP | 124 - 179 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 - 350 NM | 187 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 12 seconds | 9.4 - 11.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.0 | 4.9 - 8.5 | |
|
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, a Jeep Cherokee with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 5 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 165 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`388 | ~ 2`124 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Jeep Cherokee scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |