Hyundai Lantra 1998 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 47 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Chrysler Neon. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 8.3 | |
|
The Hyundai Lantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Lantra consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that by driving the Hyundai Lantra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Lantra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 6 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Hyundai Lantra has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Lantra has 29 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |