Hyundai Lantra 1999 vs Volvo V40 2000

 
Hyundai Lantra
1999 - 2001
Volvo V40
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 139 HP136 HP
Torque: 182 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds9.7 seconds
Hyundai Lantra is more dynamic to drive.
Hyundai Lantra engine produces 3 HP more power than Volvo V40, but torque is 8 NM less than Volvo V40. Thanks to more power Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.28.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km8.7 l/100km
The Hyundai Lantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Hyundai Lantra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway950 km on highway
670 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.48 m
Width: 1.70 m1.72 m
Height: 1.40 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1421 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`790
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): no data1200
Pros and Cons: Hyundai Lantra has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Volvo V40 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv