Hyundai Lantra 1999 vs Citroen Berlingo 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 139 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 182 NM | 147 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
Hyundai Lantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 49 HP more power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Citroen Berlingo. Thanks to more power Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
The Hyundai Lantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that by driving the Hyundai Lantra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Hyundai Lantra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Coupe | Used also on Citroen Xantia | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Lantra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Hyundai Lantra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.11 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.80 m | |
Hyundai Lantra is 34 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 40 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 624 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2800 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Hyundai Lantra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`780 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |