Hyundai Lantra 2000 vs Volvo V40 2000

 
Hyundai Lantra
2000 - 2000
Volvo V40
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 114 HP109 HP
Torque: 145 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.9 seconds12 seconds
Hyundai Lantra engine produces 5 HP more power than Volvo V40, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.77.9
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Hyundai Lantra consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 270 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
690 km on highway1000 km on highway
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years5 years
Engine spread: Used also on Hyundai CoupeUsed also on Volvo S40
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Hyundai Lantra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.48 m
Width: 1.70 m1.72 m
Height: 1.40 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1420 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`770
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): no data1200
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo V40 has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv