Hyundai Lantra 1999 vs Mazda 626 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 139 HP | 100 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 182 NM | 152 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 16.5 seconds | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.7 | 6.3 - 9.1 | |
|
Hyundai Lantra petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Hyundai Lantra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is smaller. Hyundai Lantra is 23 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1677 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`866 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 626 has
| |