Honda CR-V 2012 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 149 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 1 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
770 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. Toyota RAV4 2012: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 577 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1705 litres | |
Honda CR-V has 12 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 36 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`240 | |
Safety: | |||
Toyota RAV4 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | high | |
Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 12 800 | 13 000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |